9 Scientists and Inventors From Africa the World Should Know More About

2012_12_11_rjyADFnCAuioGbyR5Cpw55

Cheick Modibo Diarra

Diarra is a Malian-born aerospace engineer who contributed to several NASA missions such as Mars Path Finder, the Galileo spacecraft and the Mars Observer. From April 2012 to December 2012, Diarra was the prime minister of Mali until a military coup forced him to resign.

Cheikh-Anta-DiopCheikh Anta Diop 

Diop was a Senegalese historian, anthropologist, physicist and politician. His work focused on pre-colonial African history. Throughout his career, Diop studied racial phenotypes and wrote many books about his findings. There is also an university in Senegal named after him.

Young Blerds Celebrated at White House Science Fair as President Obama Dedicates $240M to Diversifying STEM

President Barack Obama has repeatedly voiced his interest in helping diversify careers in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM), and the 2015 White House Science Fair marked the president’s latest effort to follow through on his word. 

This year marked the fifth installment of the White House Science Fair, but the gathering had a particular focus — diversity.

An incredibly diverse group of students were gathered together at the White House to present their own incredible achievements in STEM.

Students from across the nation, and even as far as the U.S. Virgin Islands, demonstrated their amazing potential to be tomorrow’s leaders in Silicon Valley.

With STEM careers being in high demand and officials fearing a possible deficit of people to fill these jobs in a few years, it’s important to get more youths into such fields.

What’s more important, however, is to make sure that marginalized communities are not continuing to be overlooked as the nation prepares to welcome the new wave of engineers, programmers, developers and more.

Silicon Valley has been heavily criticized for its stunning lack of diversity and it’s a trend that has been true throughout all areas of STEM.

The president is hoping to help change that by committing $240 million in private-sector commitments to help diversity STEM fields.

“We don’t want to just increase the number of American students in STEM,” the president said at the White House Science Fair. “We want to make sure everybody is involved. We want to increase the diversity of STEM programs as well. That means reaching out to boys and girls, men and women, of all races and all backgrounds. Science is for all of us. And we want our classrooms and labs and workplaces and media to reflect that.”

Progress is still being made in hopes to make that vision a reality, but at least that vision was realized at the science fair.

The diverse teams helped obliterate all misconceptions that Black people aren’t in STEM fields because they aren’t talented or interested enough.

“Everybody needs an opportunity to go into STEM and learn and expose themselves to such an amazing field,” Stephanie Bullock, the 16-year-old captain of the five-person crew from the U.S Virgin Islands, told The Root.

Bullock and her teammates design rockets for the Team America Rocketry Challenge.

Another group of Black youth were a part of the Village, a division of the Atlanta Children’s Foundation.

The group of young Blerds designed and built a robot that has the ability to lift and carry items on its own.

Their prowess in the STEM field will now give them the opportunity to possibly dominate the GeorgiaFIRST Robotics Peachtree Regional.

It’s an opportunity they have been preparing for with the help of Lonnie Johnson, the inventor of the Super Soaker.

Each of the young men on the team have spent more than two years in foster care but never let their circumstances dictate their own potential.

Many of the young men and women at the science fair carried similar messages.

Another young lady opened up about how her own teachers doubted her when she enrolled in an advanced class.

Tiye Garrett-Mills, 17, admitted that it was a hurtful experience but told The Root that she never let that experience alter her aspirations.

“The thing is, it hurts, but…you have to let that fuel you, you can’t let that stop you, because you can achieve amazing things,” she told The Root. “Two years ago I would not have thought this was possible. But I just shook hands with the president today. I just explained my science-fair project to Barack Obama, and that’s because I didn’t let people stop me.”

It’s a message she hopes all young Black men and women in STEM will listen to.

Facebook’s Acquisition of WhatsApp Will Not Force the App to Sell Out on Its Ad-Free Promise

In a not-so-shocking announcement that will likely cause user delight and developer dismay, it has been confirmed that Facebook’s acquisition of WhatsApp will not snatch the messenger away from its ad-free roots.

Instead, however, Facebook’s Messenger app will open its doors to developers who wish to deeplink their apps into Facebook’s original messaging platform.

It’s a strategy that certainly isn’t new and was expected by many tech lovers after TechCrunch busted the myth that WhatsApp would soon be filled with annoying game invitations and third-party advertisements.

Not to mention the fact that David Marcus, the head of Facebook’s Messenger, hinted during an interview last year that WhatsApp users had nothing to worry about.

Rather than transform WhatsApp into something new, Facebook is merely adding the lovably simplistic app to its repertoire of communication tools.

This allows users to still have access to a simple, ad-free messaging option while Facebook holds on to its newest brand motto of “too much is never enough.”

So it will be Facebook’s Messenger Platform that gives developers the link to the platform’s millions of users that they’ve been looking for, not WhatsApp.

In the grander scheme of things, it seems like a fair deal.

Developers get to use Facebook’s Messenger to sink their teeth into roughly 700 million monthly users while WhatsApp remains true to the mantra that helped launch it to success in the first place.

“No Ads! No Games! No Gimmicks!”

In fact, it was back in 2012 when WhatsApp posted a detailed blog about why it refuses to sell ads even though that decision has left many developers with their arms folded in the corner or simply walking out in the middle of the WhatsApp co-founder’s presentation.

The latter is not playful banter or a hypothetical situation.

It’s the reality that WhatsApp co-founder Brian Acton was met with Wednesday during a panel discussion at Facebook’s F8 developer conference in San Francisco.

Acton was joined by other executives on the panel, but he was clearly one subject that the group of developers had a particular interest in.

Why? Because this was the man who became a wealthy entrepreneur by putting consumer experience over developers’ desires.

During the discussion, one developer publicly pleaded with Acton to shift gears and allow his app to “connect with its large user base overseas,” CNET reported. It was a plea that was met with a roar of applause.

Acton’s answer, however, would soon spark the sound of groans, shuffles and heavy footsteps.

“It’s a very careful and difficult thing for me to say here,” Acton said. “No, we don’t have any plans right now at this time.”

Acton added that while he understood what the developers wanted and was “empathetic” to their cause to extend certain tools and services to users across the globe, he also wasn’t willing to sell out on WhatsApp’s classic mantra.

“I receive emails from people on a routine basis that want to either run their business or want to run something using WhatsApp as a backbone of their communication, but we’re balancing that with the user experience,” he said. “User experience is something we have to hold sacred … we want messages to be wanted, not solicited.”

The panel discussion had not come to a close, but Acton’s response single-handedly brought an early end for some attendees who decided to leave the room after his refusal to budge, CNET reported.

It’s unclear if developer access to Facebook’s Messenger app will be enough to ease tensions and calm the waters, but for the users who have been loyally turning to WhatsApp for all their communication needs, it was certainly the right call.

6 Tech Giants That Signed Fat Checks to Help Black Students in STEM but Still Lack Diversity in Their Own Companies

Google-HQ_2228142b

Google

Google has consistently donated to a variety of different causes aimed at boosting diversity in the tech space, including the Black Girls Code initiative. Google donated $190,000 to the initiative in 2014 but never did much for increasing diversity in its own staff. That same year, Google’s diversity report revealed that roughly 79 percent of the tech giant’s staff across the globe was male. Only about 2 percent of the staff was Black.

FCC Sees First Major Net Neutrality Challenges With Two Lawsuits Accusing the Agency of Overstepping Its Boundaries

FCC net neutrality

It has been less than two weeks since the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) published its new net neutrality rules on its website, and two lawsuits slamming the new regulations have already surfaced, claiming that the agency overstepped its boundaries.

Supporters of net neutrality were warned not to start celebrating as soon as the FCC established its new set of net neutrality rules.

Many major telecommunications groups and corporate powers threatened to come after the agency if it tried to strip them of their power to regulate transmission speeds based on content and higher-priced plans.

The FCC barely got to sit back and admire its new legislation before USTelecom and Alamo Broadband followed up on that promise.

The trade group, which includes AT&T and Verizon, and the Texas-based broadband provider initiated separate filings in different districts of the U.S. Court of Appeals, requesting that the new regulations are not enforced because the FCC allegedly acted beyond its authority.

The suits slammed the FCC’s new set of rules as “arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion.”

“We do not believe the Federal Communications Commission’s move to utility-style regulation invoking Title II authority is legally sustainable,” USTelecom President Walter McCormick said in a statement, according to The Washington Post. “Therefore, we are filing a petition to protect our procedural rights in challenging the recently adopted open Internet order.”

Regardless of the new filings, the rules won’t go into effect until 60 days after they appear in the Federal Register.

The FCC has acknowledged the recent challenges, but the agency doesn’t seem too concerned that the filings will result in any major changes.

In a statement, the FCC called the petitions “premature and subject to dismissal.”

Just as one side of the legal battlefield is gearing up for war, however, so is the other.

An industry lobbyist that represents smaller telecom firms is ready to support the FCC’s move toward net neutrality.

“Our side does want an early challenge so that this administration will defend it, and [FCC Chairman Tom] Wheeler will defend it,” the lobbyist told The Washington Post. “The sooner the better.”

Other groups have stepped forward to emphasize the fact that the FCC has a strong case and also don’t believe the recent filings will be any real issue for the agency.

“These companies have threatened all along to sue over the FCC’s decision, even though that decision is supported by millions of people and absolutely essential for our economy,” Matt Wood, policy director at Free Press, told The Washington Post. “Apparently, some of them couldn’t wait to make good on that threat.”

Both of the lawsuits also seem to acknowledge that their cases may not be as solid as each party hoped.

The documents noted that the filings were initiated “out of an abundance of caution” and acknowledged that the challenges might be premature.

These two challenges come after Tennessee already sued the FCC for blocking the state’s restrictions on city-run Internet services back in February.

As for consumers across the nation, however, net neutrality is a topic many have gotten excited about.

Some Internet users were shocked to even discover that their Internet service providers had the right to regulate the speed of their content based on how much they were paying or what they were doing online.

Wheeler said that’s exactly why the FCC is trying to snatch some of the power over the Web out of the hands of corporations.

“The Internet is too important to allow broadband providers to make the rules,” Wheeler said.

Teen Sexters Lured Into a False Sense of Security by Popular Private Messaging Apps

Just as parents were finally starting to decode the many acronyms that fill their teenager’s text messages, a new digital challenge has presented itself — sexting.

It’s a problem that has been in the public eye for years, and it encouraged some parents to start checking their children’s phones to ensure no promiscuous messages were being sent or received.

But as sexting grew in popularity, so did private messaging apps that made getting away with secret, sexy photo-sharing too easy for the younger generation.

This growing trend also comes at a time when the younger generation seems completely oblivious to just how severe the consequences of sexting can be.

Parents can’t help but wonder what their child may be doing as they grin at the cellphones and mobile devices.

Unfortunately, apps like Snapchat, Cyber Dust and VaporChat are only making it harder for parents to find out.

These apps offer their users alternative ways to send messages that will supposedly vanish after the intended recipient sees them.

To be clear, these apps have other uses outside of sending sexually explicit messages, but it’s hard to deny the fact that these new apps lend themselves incredibly well to this growing trend.

Rather than sending a nude photo through a text message, they can send it through one of these apps before it vanishes from cyberspace for good, making it nearly impossible for their parents to discover the promiscuous messages.

Unfortunately, teens don’t realize that their parents seeing the message is the least of their troubles.

When it comes down to it, these apps aren’t as foolproof and secure as their young users often believe.

For one, many of the apps have not thwarted the power that is a screenshot — especially on Apple devices.

The most they can do is attempt to alert the user whenever someone has taken a screenshot of their private message and even that isn’t foolproof.

When the teen is alerted that their nude photo has now been stored in someone else’s phone and is at risk of being shared with others, there isn’t much of anything they can do about it.

The apps only promise a heads up … sometimes.

Yet again, however, bratty teens getting their hands on the photo and showing it off to friends is still not the worst of possible outcomes.

Sexting, in some states, can lead to felony charges.

Diana Graber teaches a class called “cyber civics” to middle school students in Aliso Viejo, California.

She wasn’t quite as shocked to learn that the roomful of young students already knew what sexting was, but she was more surprised that they had no idea just how severe the consequences could be.

Graber told CNN that none of her students were aware that sexting could be considered a felony under child pornography laws in some states.

“They had no idea what the consequences were,” Graber told CNN. “I mean that was a complete surprise to literally all 28 kids, so it occurred to me that no one’s ever bothered to tell these kids they couldn’t do that.”

Regardless of who is sending what to whom, some states will only see the dissemination of nude photos of underage teens.

For some justice systems, that’s all they need to consider child pornography charges.

She added that it is extremely rare for students to actually go to jail over sexting, but emphasized that it’s still a possibility and could leave some nasty scars on their criminal records — not to mention the headaches of dealing with such a case.

But yet again, private messaging apps have convinced young ones that they are safe.

Even if they were accused of child pornography, what can anyone do without proof?

What if nobody ever took that dreaded screenshot? All is well, right?

That’s the mindset of someone who doesn’t quite understand cyberspace and has already forgotten the sprinkling of celebrity nudes that fell from the cloud not too long ago.

Even Snapchat and Cyber Dust can’t get past this grim truth about the digital age — nothing shared digitally is ever gone forever.

With Snapchat being one of the most popular apps of its kind, it serves as a good example of what that phrase really means.

The app warns its users that while they may attempt to delete their images and videos for good, it isn’t a guarantee that your salacious photos aren’t sitting on their servers waiting for the right warrant to come along and allow investigators to do some digital snooping

“Although we attempt to delete image data as soon as possible after the message is received and opened by the recipient (and after a certain period of time if they don’t open the message), we cannot guarantee that the message contents will be deleted in every case,” the app warns its users.
Images taken for these apps are also typically still stored on the phone. Just not in the gallery that most people would check.

Instead the information is stuffed into cleverly named files buried deep into the dark cramped corners of the phone’s memory.

Again, it is rare that a young teen will be the center of a federal investigation about child pornography as a result of their sexting, but young people have to understand that these private messaging apps aren’t nearly as safe and secure as they may seem to be.

Images are still stored. Screenshots can still be taken. Secrets can be uncovered.

Serious risks, whether in the form of cyberbullying or a criminal investigation, are still involved.